|
Author |
Message |
tarhe
All-State
Posts: 1338
Registered: Nov 2009 |
 Posted February 12th, 2012 08:47 AM IP   
Vogel keeps saying that DIII is inferior competition. I'll bet if you ask the past state champions in DIII - Cincinnait Taft, Lima Central Catholic, Cleveland Central Catholic, Ottawa-Glandorf, Cincinnato North College Hill to name a few past winners - that they were inferior Vogel would get the sh** kicked out of him.
"When all is said and done, there is usually more said than done."
|
|
  |
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 12th, 2012 06:21 PM IP
Steel's skull is still so think he can't get it.
Is D-4 inferior to D-1? If not then lets get rid of divisions.
One last time for the brain dead
14-6 in D-4 - then 8-0 in tourny = 22-6
14-6 in D-4 - then 8-0 in tourny = 22-6
14-6 in D-4 - then 8-0 in tourny = 22-6
20-0 in D-1 - then 0-1 in tourny = 20-1
20-0 in D-1 - then 0-1 in tourny = 20-1
20-0 in D-1 - then 0-1 in tourny = 20-1
^^^ All 6 teams play Lucas, Riverdale, Buckeye Central, Crestline, CC, etc (aka a NCC schedule)
The 20-0 teams are better than the 14-6 teams, BUT the 20-0 teams play D-1 tournament games and the 14-6 teams get the INFERIOR D-4 tournament to play their games. You really think that 14-6 teams gets 8 wins in D-1 while the 20-0 team gets bounced in the Sectional of D-4?
All I'm finding out is Ontario was only relevant in basketball in the 1990's, congrats. Anything before 1990 we can't use. Anything after 1999 we can't use.
And Upper Sandusky basketball was only relevant from 2000-2009. Maybe they can act like they are some kind of basketball power too.
|
|
|
|
MrSteel
All-State
Posts: 1244
Registered: Dec 2006 |
Posted February 12th, 2012 09:28 PM IP
^^^ NO! I used D2. You must have missed it.
AND you finally "GOT" it. 89/90 - 00/01. Dismal before AND mediocre since.
THAT is why they play the non-conference they have.
I know a larger school stands a greater chance of winning. Hell vogel, EVERONE knows that. BUT, to pump your chest and dismiss others as "inferior" is bush league. THAT attitude is why the smaller NOL schools left. It is THAT attitude that keeps others away.
THAT is why you were upset Bucyrus, Galion and Upper left. YOU wanted to keep pumping your chest beating them. You desire nothing but doing the same to Ontario. Willard may not be able to do it. But you would have a field day with the bigger schools who could. People figured you out long ago.
|
|
|
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 06:20 AM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
^^^ NO! I used D2. You must have missed it.
|
You are just as dumb as Foulmouth
You think D-2 = D-3?
If so then come join D-2. You would get Willard in the Sectional Semi then Shelby in the Sectional Final.
Bet it would be another trip home in the Sectional. But you will be going to Districts in D-3. Equal
|
|
|
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 06:22 AM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
AND you finally "GOT" it. 89/90 - 00/01. Dismal before AND mediocre since.
|
Then PLEASE stop pretending Ontario is anything other than another Galion or Upper Sandusky. Your school is mediocre at basketball so PLEASE stop pretending your teams are worth anything.
Join a real league.
|
|
|
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 06:24 AM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
BUT, to pump your chest and dismiss others as "inferior" is bush league. THAT attitude is why the smaller NOL schools left. It is THAT attitude that keeps others away.
|
yes Galion and Upper left the NOL because they read on NOSF the user named 'Vogel' dogging them. 
Wow, you are insane.
Ontario people must be drinking some tainted water because they are insane in the membrane.
|
|
|
|
MrSteel
All-State
Posts: 1244
Registered: Dec 2006 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 09:13 AM IP
Quote:
Vogel wrote:
You are just as dumb as Foulmouth
You think D-2 = D-3?
If so then come join D-2. You would get Willard in the Sectional Semi then Shelby in the Sectional Final.
Bet it would be another trip home in the Sectional. But you will be going to Districts in D-3. Equal
|
Obviously you can not read.
vogel-"If so then come join D-2. You would get Willard in the Sectional Semi then Shelby in the Sectional Final."
^^^ Way to go Bundy. Ontario will just decide to go to D2. Thats how it works???
You started out arguing that Ontario should be playing in a larger league and not itty bitty schools?
Now you've been making the case that they can not compete with larger schools.
You STILL dont know what your talking about!!!
Which is it????????????
|
|
|
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 09:10 PM IP
You guys keep saying your D-3 teams were better than your D-2 teams. And basing it off of tournament runs.
I say your D-2 teams could have made the same tournament runs down in D-3. D-3 is inferior to D-2.
If you were up in D-2 this year you'd be going home in the Sectional again. But look where you are in the inferior D-3. Now go rack up some D-3 tournament wins so Foulmouth can say it proves the 2012 team was better than the 2007 team.
Your 2011 team - District Champs in D-3
Your 2011 team in D-2? hmm, I'd bet on another Sectional loss
|
|
|
|
MrSteel
All-State
Posts: 1244
Registered: Dec 2006 |
Posted February 13th, 2012 10:06 PM IP
Quote:
Vogel wrote:
You guys keep saying your D-3 teams were better than your D-2 teams. And basing it off of tournament runs.
|
VOGEL says that.
POOR reading comprehension.
WE say based on ooc wins and losses.
D2 teams could not win D2 ooc. Why would they succeed in D2 tourney if they can not win D2 ooc?
2011 1-5 ooc. WEAK area got them to D3 regional. The regional game showed why they were 1-5 ooc.
(Edited by MrSteel)
|
|
|
|
scooter
All-State
Posts: 1923
Registered: Aug 2005 |
Posted February 20th, 2012 08:18 AM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
WE say based on ooc wins and losses.
D2 teams could not win D2 ooc. Why would they succeed in D2 tourney if they can not win D2 ooc?
2011 1-5 ooc. WEAK area got them to D3 regional. The regional game showed why they were 1-5 ooc.
(Edited by MrSteel)
|
So you are saying last season you were 1-5 in ooc but made it to regionals in D3. I think that sorta makes Vogel's point.
bottom of the ninth, not time outs, it's 4th down with no fouls to give and I'm swinging for the fence.
|
|
|
|
MrSteel
All-State
Posts: 1244
Registered: Dec 2006 |
Posted February 20th, 2012 10:16 AM IP
"if" you guys would READ, I said last year was a fluke, the result of a WEAK area.
Their ooc proved that.
Same with locals in all divisions in this yrs tourney.
|
|
|
|
TigerTail
All-County
Posts: 185
Registered: Aug 2011 |
Posted February 20th, 2012 10:57 AM IP
Well if you guys would read THIS IS A FOOTBALL FORUM !!!!!!!!!
Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
Vogel
Sir Lancelot du Lac
Posts: 4057
Registered: Apr 2009 |
Posted February 21st, 2012 09:57 PM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
"if" you guys would READ, I said last year was a fluke, the result of a WEAK area.
|
Not a fluke, D-3 in this area is typically at that level just about every year. D-3 is inferior to D-2.
If D-3 isn't inferior then Ontario should try D-2 this year.
D-3 Ontario gets out again
D-2 Ontario would be going home in the Sectional again
D-3 is inferior to D-2.
Your D-2 teams would have made tournament runs down in D-3 with ease.
|
|
|
|
MrSteel
All-State
Posts: 1244
Registered: Dec 2006 |
Posted February 22nd, 2012 08:31 PM IP
Quote:
Vogel wrote:
Your D-2 teams would have made tournament runs down in D-3 with ease.
|
ooc suggests that they do not.
|
|
|
|
tarhe
All-State
Posts: 1338
Registered: Nov 2009 |
Posted February 23rd, 2012 07:55 AM IP
I will go out on a limb and say that DII teams are inferior to DI teams. Put that in your pipe and smoke it Vogel!
"When all is said and done, there is usually more said than done."
|
|
|
|
scooter
All-State
Posts: 1923
Registered: Aug 2005 |
Posted February 23rd, 2012 08:10 AM IP
Quote:
MrSteel wrote:
ooc suggests that they do not.
|
Maybe it would have been another fluke.
bottom of the ninth, not time outs, it's 4th down with no fouls to give and I'm swinging for the fence.
|
|
|
|
SHS2007
All-Region
Posts: 867
Registered: Feb 2010 |
Posted February 23rd, 2012 08:31 AM IP
Quote:
tarhe wrote:
I will go out on a limb and say that DII teams are inferior to DI teams. Put that in your pipe and smoke it Vogel!
|
Psh.
Sincerely,
Dayton Dunbar
|
|
|
|
galion
All-State
Posts: 3550
Registered: Nov 2009 |
Posted February 23rd, 2012 09:31 AM IP
What you meant to say was that D2 sectionals are typically weaker than D1 sectionals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northern Ohio Sports Forum :: HS Football :: NCC Football :: "New" OCC League to Form
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 |
