Northern Ohio Sports Forum

Local baseball and softball scores - click here! Welcome to NOSF! Bring it HARD!!! Baumspage Track and Field Results!!!

Post new topic Post reply

Page: 1 2
Author Message
Willard Fillmore
All-World

Posts: 10519
Registered: Dec 2006
 Posted March 10th, 2012 03:38 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Quote:
scooter wrote:
NO, you pointed out why SMCC lost.


Which is the MAJOR reason CC won. What CC did MUCH better than SMCC.

13
   
scooter
All-State

Posts: 1924
Registered: Aug 2005
 Posted March 10th, 2012 03:40 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Try to spin but still a slap in the face compliment.
bottom of the ninth, not time outs, it's 4th down with no fouls to give and I'm swinging for the fence.
   
NothingButAir
All-District

Posts: 333
Registered: Dec 2010
 Posted March 10th, 2012 03:44 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Willy... You made it a point to post why SMCC lost.. NOT WHY CC WON. CC won because THEY made the last shot TO WIN! CC won the game SMCC did NOT lose the game! Great game to have witnessed! Both teams deserved to win!
"I've missed over 9,000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times I've been trusted to take the game-winning shot . . . and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."

Michael Jordan
   
Willard Fillmore
All-World

Posts: 10519
Registered: Dec 2006
 Posted March 10th, 2012 03:47 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
NO "spin". NO "slap in the face". YOU ARE A HATER. You CANNOT read my mind. You are ASSuming per usual, you are clueless.

AGAIN.... the SPECIFIC area in which CC played MUCH better than SMCC was foul shooting. 74% vs 44%. The MAJOR reason CC won the game.

13
   
NothingButAir
All-District

Posts: 333
Registered: Dec 2010
 Posted March 10th, 2012 03:53 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Quote:
Willard Fillmore wrote:
NO "spin". NO "slap in the face". YOU ARE A HATER. You CANNOT read my mind. You are ASSuming per usual, you are clueless.

AGAIN.... the SPECIFIC area in which CC played MUCH better than SMCC was foul shooting. 74% vs 44%. The MAJOR reason CC won the game.


Your initial post pointed out Why SMCC lost. Your the Hater! Look in the mirror! You loser!

"I've missed over 9,000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. 26 times I've been trusted to take the game-winning shot . . . and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed."

Michael Jordan
   
Willard Fillmore
All-World

Posts: 10519
Registered: Dec 2006
 Posted March 10th, 2012 04:03 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Quote:
NothingButAir wrote:
Willy... You made it a point to post why SMCC lost.. NOT WHY CC WON. CC won because THEY made the last shot TO WIN! CC won the game SMCC did NOT lose the game! Great game to have witnessed! Both teams deserved to win!


NBA you ALWAYS look for a reason to HATE. You ALWAYS look for a reason to call people names. You ALWAYS look for a reason to use put downs.

In the area of foul shooting. Did one of the teams shoot better than they usually do? Did one team shoot worse than they usually do? Did both teams shoot at or near the % they usually do?

When I presented the foul shooting facts of the game I DID NOT mean to put down either team. All I meant to do was point out the BIGGEST reason that one team won vs the other team losing.

Foul shooting percentage is really the only area that one team has no control over how the other team performs. Thus if a team shoots well below or well over their normal % for the year and it's a close game, they've controlled their destiny. Thus, it looked to me the reason that SMCC lost the game.

13
   
FbFan
All-Region

Posts: 680
Registered: Aug 2011
 Posted March 10th, 2012 04:21 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Quote:
Willard Fillmore wrote:
CC has to hope Edgerton shoots foul shots as poorly as Sandusky SMC. They only made 12 of 27 against CC. THE reason they lost the game.


You could have said that "Edgerton has to hope that CC does not shoot foul shots as well as they did against SSMC. They shot 74%, THE reason they won the game".
   
Willard Fillmore
All-World

Posts: 10519
Registered: Dec 2006
 Posted March 10th, 2012 04:27 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
CC is a good 3-point shooting team, thus 74% foul shooting is a reasonable %. SMCC's 44% is not good for any team, hence the thought was it is well below their normal FT %.
13
   
Larry Legend
All-Block

Posts: 34
Registered: Dec 2011
 Posted March 10th, 2012 09:26 PM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Nice win by CC. Great to see them rep the NCC in the regional.
   
Willard Fillmore
All-World

Posts: 10519
Registered: Dec 2006
 Posted March 11th, 2012 12:01 AM   IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
Onward one game at a time CC.
13
   



Posts:
Registered:
 Posted    IP           Reply with quote Edit Post Delete post
  
Northern Ohio Sports Forum :: HS Basketball :: NCC Basketball :: DIV District Final Colonel Crawford vs Sandusky SMC
Page: 1 2
Mark all forums read
Logout
All times are EST
Forum jump:
Thread Options:
Delete thread / Open/Close thread / Rename thread / Stick thread / Move thread / Merge thread

Post new topic Post reply
< Previous thread | Next thread > | Subscribe to thread |

Listen to games on: wlkrradio.com = Norwalk ------ wlec.com = Sandusky ------ wttf.com = Tiffin ------ wfob.com = Fostoria
Back to the fun!!!
HS Football Rankings Norwalk Truckers Football The NEW Huddle for non-paying Huddle members!
Shelby Whippets Football NOL Statistical Website
Links related to NOSF
View Vogels Football and Basketball rankings

Opinions expressed on this site are just that, opinions.
Beware Thin Skinned People: Crying to mods doesn't work here
Northern Ohio Sports Forum is in no way affiliated with any school.
Locations of visitors to this page