|
Author |
Message |
Fenris
no one of consequence
Posts: 631
Registered: Apr 2006 |
 Posted 12-06-06 01:48 PM IP   
Syllogistically, given that there are a set of expectations placed upon an object, and the object is subject to all relative laws that we believe to govern the actions of most of our universes, that is to say, the object must first be "made aware" of the expectations in order to fulfill them, what would happen to an object that was not aware of the expectations placed upon it?
|
|
  |
|
Mori X
That girl your parents don't want you to become
Posts: 2532
Registered: Apr 2006 |
Posted 12-06-06 01:58 PM IP
It would foolishly believe there were no laws and the laws would quickly work that object into submission as it tried to exist without the gravity that pulled it to its death
The belief that religion is a requirement of morality stinks of sociopathy...
|
|
 |
|
Fenris
no one of consequence
Posts: 631
Registered: Apr 2006 |
Posted 12-06-06 02:06 PM IP
blam. shot down. ^__^ Thanks!
|
|
|
|
antiklaus
Deviate Master and 10th degree Blackbelt of Gaming no Jutsu
Posts: 1084
Registered: Apr 2006 |
Posted 12-06-06 02:44 PM IP
I think that applying syllogistic reasoning in a world where the uncertainty principle and superimposed states are being demonstrated more and more (if not wholly understood) is a bit "something something" - presumptive perhaps... but more... like .... bad reasoning perhaps?
"I think therefore I am" is actually in need of a rewrite given what we are coming to understand of the universe...
This new understanding is of course, nascent. but that doesn't mean that it's wrong. Those areas of science we could not before explain are starting to make sense in this new paradigm. And applying an either/or kind of framework to them seems like using Newtonian 'law' to understand relativistic principles.
|
|
|
|
Fenris
no one of consequence
Posts: 631
Registered: Apr 2006 |
Posted 12-07-06 04:24 PM IP
true enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Oak Hollow :: Knowledge :: Philosophy :: A Quanderous Query |
